case brief: eternal law

My son, walk not thou in the way with them; Refrain thy foot from their path: For their feet run to evil, And make haste to shed blood. — Proverbs 1:16 sadassasa What would happen if a lawyer helped a client incriminate themselves? What if it benefited the client? This might sound ridiculous, but this is the American legal system, affirmed in Lafler versus Cooper. The expectation is that any morally upstanding American (white) has no contact with the law. However the sixth recognizes that contact is necessary not only for resolution of the cause of action, but also to restore justice to the bereft.

However, overcriminalization disrupts this connection between the justice system and the public it serves. It introduces to any cognizant American a preponderance of potential liability. The Supreme Court recognized long-pending cases can introduce a corrosive effect to the carrying out of justice in Barker v. Wingo. However it does not concretely address the defendant's inherit interest in closure. Within the discussion of procedural matters, we have rid ourselves of the most obvious: a court (common) only finds guilt.

So we recognize a social interest, not innocence, in allowing the accused to not suffer undue deprivation. However a court that can only provides broad extinguishment of it's claims by a declaration of guilt, produces as a natural result negative externalities. Rational actors, and reasonable persons both choose plea over trial, refuse to testify in fear of implication, and flee justice even if otherwise they would not be found guilty. Thus the wide prosecutorial leeway this introduces creates both uncertainty and anxiety not only for the defendant but the bereft parties.

Thus plea is the equilibrium state, trivial outcome

Thus with tolling extending existing statute of limitations, the discretion to charge and thus this burden of uncertainty could be made indefinite. In lieu of benefiting the defendant's case, collateral liability can grow with time. Continuing conduct compounded by overcriminalization can result in potentially infinite prosecutorial leverage. The resolution of actions are then lost in expanding discussions about relevant conduct, meaning to belay charges in the short term benefits the prosecution. This ultimately puts prosecutorial discretion at the cost of relief for victims and the public which are immediately harmed from the adverse courses of action.

Hence, a prosecution can rest their case until the heat death of the universe, collecting all possible leads and in a last ditch effort charge a case with perfect information. An unassailable, flawless prosecution. A perfect criminal justice system. However death tolls for no one, and soon enough heat death passes, and blood-black nothingness begins to spin. And again, we meet through Nietzsche's or Poincare's recurrence with our beloved course of action, reappearing to us as fact again. The prosecution has made it's final complaint: We knew it would happen and we did nothing.

However an airtight plea will not save you in modern society. The simultaneous jurisdiction of internet crimes could implicate you in not just dual sovereignty, limited by the 5th, but every possible configuration of jurisdiction. This includes the federal government with 574 tribal nations, and federal enclaves from anywhere up to 5,000 (although apparently we haven't audited how many since the 60s), with notable ones being D.C., the Pentagon, and military bases across the world. 50 state governments and interstate jurisdictions like the PANYNJ, DRPA, DRBA, WMATA, MWAA, QCMEG, Bi-State Development Agency, the Palisades Interstate Park Commission. Four domestic Class I railroads who are subject to both federal and state jurisdiction, and two international Class I railroads which are also under foreign law. And finally Amtrak PD and the TVA Police which fall under their own federal jurisdictions.

Therefore the most legally consistent and binding result is to satisfy maximal prosecution under both state and federal jurisdiction. Self-prosecution. Self-preclusion. Extinguishment of all doubt. Putting one self to the flame. Legal suicide. It's the most ethical course of action. This however would introduce a great procedural burden on the state... they would not only have to rule for past conduct, but for any possible conduct of the individual. To consider again and again a second death. Eternal "haste" must be affirmed with eternal guilt, thus it is impossible for the world to exist without producing relevant guilt. Even affirmation affirms it's negation, a final charge of conspiracy on the enterprise of existence

Ping pong

Ping pong

Ping pong

Ping pong circulate

Ping pong circulate is a square dance call, that rearranges partners in the square to switch position and face each other, much like how ping-pong balls bounce from one face to another. In it's portrayal of REVOCs as a multinational fashion conglomerate, Kill la Kill turns the katakana pun of fash《ファッショ》 and fashion 《ファッション》 into a strange accusation - that global liberalism is itself some sort of fascism, that the local parochialism and strictness of Japanese school 《制服》 is in fact a secret resistance to it's subjugation and to the enthrallment 《征服》 of global capital. A mirroring that reveals it spells out in reverse: COVERs.

Kill la Kill is a show that takes Land's suggestion that capital is an alien god from the future, a bit too literally. Human life is not accelerated by the increasing estrangement of pure intelligence, but by the primordial life fibre. History is dictated by a promethean force that, like the Matrix, consumes human vitalism and spits out COVERs. Oh like song covers... LMFAO

So it is incredible that in an anime ostensibly against the cultural homogenization of globalism, that Sawano orchestrates it with a mix of square dance calls, post-rock electronica fusion, and German and English vocals. And the track, Blumenkranz lit. flower crown asks a simple question: Ist der Blumengarten echt oder falsch? Faustian references are no stranger to anime, and Kill la Kill follows directly in the footsteps of Guilty Crown and Madoka Magica in this regard, but with a deeper symbolic engagement. The garden of Blumenkranz directly draws on the story of Gretchen, where the innocent plucks at the daisy asking if Faust "loves me, loves me not":

Gretchen, who embodies the characteristics of purity and innocence represented by the daisy, is also the agent who destroys the daisy and thus manipulates her own fate, setting the plot in motion. — A New Gretchenfrage

Thus this suspension of is reality or not reality is even applied to the garden itself. This doubling and then reversal of meaning, of innocence is perfectly then described in it's description of the flower crown: "Du bindest einen Blumenkranz" A innocence and victory that weaves and binds. This corresponds to the American Bane edginess that was popular during the Global Recession, "Victory has defeated you, Batman". The perfect description of post-War capitalistic excess. One bound by a peace and/or guilt cult.

verbinden (to connect, to heal) and gebunden (bound, captive).

Even the BGM titles reflect this weaving nature, using numbers, letters, musical notes, and kanji interchangeably to spell out the titular figures:

• goriLLA蛇L = gorilla (Ganagorii's Theme) + kiLL LA + 蛇 (Nonon's theme)+ kilL The character for serpent, the first character of Nonon's family name 蛇崩, usually read as じゃ, combined with る forms the distinct rural and folksy copula zyaaaaa that Nonon uses.
• 犬Kあ3L = 犬 (Inu) + K(か) + あ(a) + 3(み) + L(る) 犬キルる - The dog simply kills (Inumuta's Theme) 犬かみる(犬神る)- The underdog bites back and becomes divine (Sanageyama's Theme) 犬美過ぎる - The dog/spy is too beautiful (Mikisugi's Theme)

The mysterious homeroom teacher Mikisugi is revealed as a spy for NUDIST BEACH. Where the キ/き/杉 in Mikisugi's name itself recurses into the kanji itself is being cut into three

• 木: a tree, a data structure or a traditional clapper used at the beginning of matches
• 彡: 三 or action lines
• mi : the third solfège

Thus キルlaキル comes with every combination of sound and meaning (KILL/キル/きる)/切る/着る back and forward. It's not simple "la" but a statement that comes from multiple romance languages at once. It answers the question: does man maketh clothes, or clothes maketh man.

It is absolutely both and none at all.

「BANG　BANG　BANG　BANG」

They don't want you, they don't need you

They want to find you, they want to kill you

They want to hold you

AN UNDERDOG (ALWAYS) BITES

BACK； A message to all my current and future detractors:

I am giving you your best chance to put me down. No take backsies.

As you may or may not be aware, there is so such thing as a restraining order per se in Wisconsin and under many other state laws. Instead there are only TROs - temporary restraining orders, lasting up to 14 days unless extended. However injunctions can last from anywhere from 4-10 years and prohibit specific conduct. In most cases under Wisconsin law, the petition can skip directly to injunction, the TRO meant to only provide emergency, temporary relief. I however cannot leave unamended even a single step of justice as the self-assigned Self-Prosecutor General. I will accelerate and accelerate post-haste the carrying out of justice, for the children. Think of them. Not too much though.

For being filth of the earth, for daring to exist, I have already reprimanded myself to the ultimate punishment. But I still do not exist enough, to punish myself for this guilt: I must exist more, and spread myself out among the void for lack of vagueness. And thus I implicate myself in one of man's greatest crimes: making a beautiful woman cry.

940.32 Stalking: Subsection (a) Subdivision 6. Contacting the victim by telephone, text message, electronic message, electronic mail, or other means of electronic communication or causing the victim’s telephone or electronic device or any other person’s telephone or electronic device to ring or generate notifications repeatedly or continuously, regardless of whether a conversation ensues.

Subdivision 10. Causing a person to engage in any of the acts described in subds. 1. to 9.

And once I read this, I as a self-prosecutor knew that the only logically conclusion to maximize my liability: conspiracy. Many might know, or not that in hyper niche terminally online internet queer communities it is very easy to make someone contact or otherwise harass someone by a simple rape or pedophilia allegation. Of course the assumption is that no one would never make up or exaggerate an action, even to get mere justice. Or simply for the thrill and attention of it. Never, people are essentially rational, even to the point of self-incrimination. Wait.

I'm such a horrible human being, a worm, an insect,,, no lower,,, a microbe perhaps. A little birthday boy. Yet convincing myself of my righteousness, I also made false accusations against her... I called her a woke shotxcon, a repeat philanderer, a worthless, soulless dago. Actually scratch that last one. And a digital rapist. She raped my mind bro. Can't recover damages from that, rape of the soul. That's immaterial. After realizing my deep faults, and the burden of such words and thoughts existing about her because of my actions, I have decided to accept the maximalist liability for such a case.

I realized that there was no bound on the potential conduct I could've caused. What threads of fate and petals of distaste I tugged and pulled on when implicating her in such... heinously perverted action. What consequences I have caused towards her by my simple accusation. Every every reply to her callout posts,,, all the people who reached out to her because of my false accusations... was an individual I caused to contact her... I'm so fucked up. And yet I still did nothing

Callout culture directly hurts victims of stalking and harassment. Every time the perpetrator does something, the victim is informed through the grapevine, thus binding them together. This can be abused by the perpetrator to indirectly contact the victim through committing merely distasteful or additional adverse acts.

Every wound is not only a door for pain but a hole for things to enter and exit as they please mmhmmm

DOWN

LOCKED OUT

UP

IN

List of Alternate Twitter Accounts

Here is a list of accounts dating from 12/30/2024—12/30/2026, establishing the course of conduct and timeframe of the general action.

However by revealing this as a fact of public record... I knowingly invite more harassment, and open up my liability to anyone in any jurisdiction to commit an continuing offense compelled and contingent on my actions. However, I accept this too, because it is functionally equivalent to my accusations against her. By the the mere account of accusal, I open the same horizon of possibility, a potential world where deprivation could exist. And thus even the appearance of deprivation is burden itself.

However in your full receipt of this, you have become a unknowing accomplice, a fellow partner in the dance of conspiracy. You have aided or abetted the violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which has been broadly interpreted as criminalizing the sharing and use of passwords. Every account is both a mirror and portal, providing two-way liability: to actually use it is to criminalize yourself and induce liability for me in a new place, a new time, the same course of action circulating again. Of course there's a catch. Not every account is made with the same authorization, a subtlety not appreciated by the retrograde courts. Some proportion of accounts within the aforementioned account list are locked by recovery codes. Therefore, it is impossible to verify yourself that an account is prima facie still solely under my authorization or not, even though I provided the entire credentials (in a narrow sense). Therefore you must either append yourself to the conspiracy and attempt to login in to an account which may or may not grant full access or press for legal relief in revealing the entire details of each account.

There is little actual difference in this regard: my actions caused the conduct of others, and therefore I am so liable. But the ambiguity of this situation provides itself inherit and novel burden on the bereft, which courts do not quantify. The interlocutor is not satisfactorily covered by simple tort, or protection order. Even in a civil court, the third party introduces a settlement problem which cannot be easily resolved: A conspiracy.

Transaction History of OnlyFans user @u492778622

All Time: Apr 14, 2025 - May 07, 2026 (local time UTC -05:00)

There is a hidden irony in the outcome in the administration's attempt at Operation Metro Surge. It is almost like they intuitively understood my corrosive legal theory, and attempted the praxis. They poisoned the legal well for any potential civil RICO case against the residents of Minneapolis-Saint Paul. By their gross misconduct in the handling the situation, they have granted the worst actors by any bipartisan account, those who profit from our enterprise.

Transcript of video file "ml8q9lRMAeysbxvE"

If you are a "boy" and you play necrons or orks or t'au or eldar, please hit me up† I need people who want to cuddle all day and have absolutely no dreams or ambitions in life And just want to combine our income so we can buy more grey plastic And estradiol so we can inject ourselves with it And spend all day cuddling and sucking dick and drinking too much Yeah. [subject sticks out her tongue]

† For the uninitiated, these are the main four Xenos factions one could reasonably take if the speaker already claimed imperium, in effect meaning ANY one.

In Wisconsin, being a more conservative state, has many archaic obscenity crimes that would fall under triggering crimes for conspiracy, including adultery and bigamy. These themselves however are not concrete enough, and we must build up the chain. If someone has a history of recruiting partners through cohabitation arrangements, presenting as available for a committed relationship, then producing obscene material with them commercially, a history of multiple non-material long term partners goes directly to showing deliberate enterprise design rather than incidental conduct. It paints the cohabitation as a recruitment mechanism for an obscenity enterprise.

The state's explicit position in §944.21 that it "does not condone or encourage any form of sexual conduct outside the institution of marriage" creates an interesting prosecutorial framing opportunity. If defendants argue their cohabiting relationship makes the obscene material essentially private or domestic in character, Wisconsin's own statutory language can be turned against that argument: the state explicitly refuses to extend marital protection to non-marital conduct regardless of relationship duration.

Thus with this basis, we can continue to build upon this foundation of indecency with additional potential violations of statues such as §944.23 Making lewd, obscene or indecent drawings or writings in public or in a public place §944.25 Sending an unsolicited electronic mail solicitation to a person that contains obscene material without including the words “ADULT ADVERTISEMENT”. These are weaker charges on specific material that need to satisfy the Miller test. However, we can use these materials to characterize the enterprise's pattern of operation with the central claim of prostitution.

To establish prostitution, Wisconsin already gives us much leeway in State v. Kittilstad, where the physical involvement of the solicitor is not required, but participation. In fact the transaction itself even need not even happen, simply the repeat solicitation for prostitution itself. The state code explicitly, under the incest statute, advocates for a narrower interpretation of Lawrence v. Texas, especially as it does not address commercial production. We can use the nature of the enterprise to bootstrap participation of any potential solicitor, if we can show that any significant contact of the solicitor before the commercial transaction with a member that can reasonably construed to be part of the enterprise.

Thus we could characterize potential defendants as a financial enterprise engaged in conspiracy to commit the practice of prostitution, with the production of lewd writing and distribution of obscene drawings as part of it's process of recruitment (§944.32). Other coinhabitants become panderers (§944.33), facilitating the operation. The location of cohabitation itself becomes an established place of prostitution (§944.34). This could satisfy the minimum bar for the Wisconsin Organized Crime Control Act and if conducted across state lines, RICO.

And if we give this above section to Claude, it produces the evidence for the case to be true:

- **Direct solicitation of sexual conduct** in communications, not merely production agreements
- **Non-performer third parties** paying for access to participants (not content), which more cleanly satisfies traditional prostitution definitions
- **Explicit financial exchange discussions** that reference conduct rather than content

Conclusion

Too bad I picked Chaos Daemons. Some may say I carried out a multi-year campaign for the sole purpose of bullying autistic people. That's the wrong perspective: I enabled autistic people to feel like they could take control of their own lives. By using myself as human bait. And isn't that magical? However, it kinda backfired... now they feel like they're regular human beings who can cast off their estrangement from society and become NORMAL. Thus I must fix this with post-haste.

An argument under Wisconsin law that one was in conspiracy to practice prostitution, recruiting potential vulnerable young autistic trans girls through the internet using anime porn, smut, and Warhammer memes to whore them out to your boyfriend, the owner and ringleader, and a friend group of co-conspirators/victims to use them for promotion an OnlyFans and practice would not only be highly corrosive to any challenges that beset you legally, but socially.

a selfish dog bites off more than they can chew

There was another Eden from Seattle Island who talked to her at the same time as me. There was a subtweet, from a prominent anti-transbian, who described her as a "hung hon", but yeah she was nice and had a big dick. In Violet's little autistic, selfish mind, she probably mixed us together. Narcissism is not only a personality disorder but a cognitive one. Thus with my words and her actions we reached up far deeper into her than she ever expected, and she fell madly in love with Eden from Seattle.

With that psychopathological cheese wedge, I went to work assisting Violet in finding more trans girls. The most effective technique in this regard was to cast myself as the villain, and thereby clad her in innocence. Thus the controversy generated more and more attention, and lured the most vulnerable and empathetic people who would be ripe as fresh meat. Alexandria or whoever from Texas was her next androgynous drip of sticky bislop goodness. I encouraged her to meet with Violet, knowing her photography affinity with Ben would deepen this wedge.

The final step requires the city mouse, who ran away from the rotting far east. Into the labyrinth of another, the Minotaur is just an simulation. Show me your power. Plucking a mouse off her dead mother's teat, smiling. No bowl, no sun, nor rain. Okay sure, but where are the messages? Cooperation doesn't need explicit consent, agreement, or even full intention. And the law reflects this. As long as the co-conspirator is within a pattern that shows benefit towards a shared goal, they could be considered a participant. Subtweets could be used to provide updates, establish common goals, and more all under the pretense of other behavior.

an old dog can't learn new tricks

Isn't it sociologically interesting that even after moving out of the PNW Violet still operates on churning through naïve and vulnerable young queer people for sexual favours, using bodies to boost one's own self esteem and social standing using the promise of housing, sex and community? It drips with the same of disgusting soft-rape that comes with the middle upper-class tastelessness that grimes and ninajirachi embody.

In all honesty, these people are simply dirtbag real-estate salesmen. They portray themselves as salt of the earth losers in their trustfund traphouse, finally making "owning" a home open to their polymates. It's incredible we let poly essentially both legalize all sorts of corruption and malfeasance within relationships, and also reinforce incredibly puritanically sexual mores by constantly policing whether something was abuse.

If one seeks to quash these claims, to bring settlement and peace to society, there are some simple steps one could take. We could criticize this form of guilt that we impose on each other. We could hasten to each other, realizing the shortness of our days. But principally, we could make a statement together, in support of not just abolishing past wrongs, but holding up a future that is better for the forgotten.

monkey see, monkey do:

%% eden the hapa is my parter... in crime. we kidnap and drug trans girls while listening to evil ass rape music like limeboiler and 4lung. then we brainwash them with g/acc goonaganda to carry out our sexual jihad %%

Thus admit is the equilibrium state, a trivial outcome

Dress me up like the choices you made

Dress me up as a punchline